HOMEPROGRAMS AND PROJECTSABOUT USCONTACT USSITE MAPPARTNERSLINKS


FELLOWS SPEAK
VOLUNTEERS INTEGRATION PROGRAM
BOOKS AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS

ARCHIVES
EVENTS

MEDIA ADVOCACY
 

Exercises of the Elite

By Elmer A. Ordonez*
The Other View column, The Manila Rimes
September 12, 2009
Posted by CenPEG

I have long held that EDSA in 1986 marked the transfer of power from one set of oligarchs to another and the restoration of supposedly free elections, which, according to Fr. John Carroll, S.J. (“Building from Above,” Inquirer, 8/10/09), “have historically been exercises of the elite and for the elite.”

I generally avoid writing about presidential candidates—seeing that the leading ones for 2010 are in the mold of traditional and elite politicians.
Furthermore the ongoing election discourse does not touch on platforms or programs of action except in a cursory way as in forums. Motherhood statements are the norm, and the emphasis of media discussion is on the personalities and character traits of putative standard bearers of political groups.

Having witnessed a truly remarkable people display of love and devotion for the departed first president after EDSA, we noted the ensuing zeal for passing the torch to a reluctant heir. It seems the thrust of the drive for him to run is to draw a stark contrast between the incumbent and this opposition candidate and restore to the highest position the qualities of humility and selflessness demonstrated by his mother.

Now Noynoy Aquino, heir to his parents’ legacy, has announced his candidacy which will give him the chance to demonstrate capability and independence. The task at hand is to clean the Aegean stables of Philippine politics and provide a moral center for reformists to rally around.
The traditional political parties have more or less the same objective; they are run by elites some of whose roots and vested interests go back to colonial times. Others acquired their wealth more recently. One elite interest is in land. Land reform has long been a shibboleth in politics but has a genuine land reform bill been passed? Land reform has always favored landed politicians.

Voters also need to know candidates’ positions on national sovereignty, to hear them speak on the Visiting Forces Agreement and Philippine foreign policy.

Will we be free of US/foreign domination? What about alien ownership of Philippine land and property? Nationalist industrialization? The culture of impunity among corrupt government officials and human rights violators and torturers?

A few candidates are perceived to be “green” or advocates of environmental protection. What will they do with strip mining and continuing depredation of our diminishing forests reserves?

What about debt servicing that has taken up almost half of the national budget and deprived funds for social services such as free or affordable education, universal health care, cheaper medicines, expanded benefits for the elderly and disabled.

These are just some concerns of =he electorate whose choices are limited to elite or elite-supported candidates.
In sum, the media observers should go beyond personalities and press the candidates and political parties to spell out specifics and commitments for the 2010 elections. Ultimately it is again a bogus choice for an electorate that has learned to play along with the game of elite politicians. Somehow they had a choice in the 1992 election with Senator Salonga as the nationalist candidate, but voters preferred trapos. Even if there were real choices (e.g. elite v mass-based parties and candidates) today, majority of the voters are still tied psychically to patronage from the elite or elite-minded politicos.

Hence, the cycle continues. They elect a “promising” candidate who in time turns out to be = dud or disappointment.
The long-term agenda for alternative politics is to break that psychic bond between the ruling elites and the mass of the people.
Postscript to ‘Special =elations’

Our last piece “Special relations” has elicited responses from readers notably one, a US-based reader of The Manila Times” who, in an exchange with a local reader, turned out to be a major in the US armed forces. The major faulted me for failing to mention the “billions” of US dollars poured into Philippine coffers only to be stolen by corrupt Filipino officials. What else can one say?

Reader JM Nepomuceno has answered him point by point regarding the sorry state of the government and the economy. The American major concedes that the Filipino people should manage on their own without US help while he predicts an “implosion” in a year’s time. Are our elite politicians up to it—hacking it by ourselves, without US aid”?

________________________

eaordonez2000@yahoo.com

*Columnist Elmer Ordonez, PhD, is a member of CenPEG’s Board of Editors.

Home / Programs and Projects / About us / Contact us / Site map / Partners / Links
Telefax +6329299526 email: cenpeg@cenpeg.org; cenpeg.info@gmail.com; cenpeg2k4@yahoo.com
Copyright 2005 Center for People Empowewrment in Governance (CenPEG), Philippines. All rights reserved