Poverty
escalating under GMA
“28 Quarters of Economic Growth! Sustained growth and sound
fundamentals attracting more investments, creating more jobs!”
Thus boasts a newspaper paid advertisement by pro-administration
officials.
This could be another lie under the Arroyo administration’s
sleeves, however. In its latest report this week, the government’s
National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) said that the incidence
of poverty is escalating as more and more Filipino families are
getting poorer. The NSCB said 32.9% of the population, or 27.6
million Filipinos, are poor, nearly three percentage points higher
than the 30% reported in 2003.
The NSCB report confirms what almost every Filipino already knows:
Worsening poverty in the country. The independent think-thank
IBON Foundation says however that poverty incidence could even
be worse than what NSCB had reported. Please read the following
stories:
IBON News / March 5, 2008
NSCB Data Validates RP's
Worsening Poverty Situation
Poverty incidence could actually be higher, says think-tank
The
National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) report that poverty
in the country worsened in 2006 only proves that the claim of
Malacañang of an improving economy is false, said independent
think-tank IBON Foundation.
It
also validates the research group's findings that poverty in the
country is actually worsening for the past seven years.
According
to the NSCB, 32.9% of the population, or 27.6 million Filipinos,
are poor, nearly three percentage points higher than the 30% reported
in 2003. This was computed using an annual poverty threshold of
P15,057.
But
says IBON executive editor Rosario Bella Guzman, "The poverty
incidence could actually be worse than reported due to such low
poverty threshold."
Using
official figures, a Filipino needs just P41.25 a day to meet his
or her food and non-food basic requirements and stay out of poverty,
a figure that is obviously insufficient for all but basic subsistence
needs. "In fact, poverty in the Philippines could be so widespread
that the NSCB is using these low threshold figures to understate
the actual extent of poverty," says Guzman.
In
the IBON's self-rated poverty survey conducted last January, 7
1.7% Filipinos considered themselves poor.
The
NSCB data is not the only evidence that validates the growing
poverty in the country. Images of poverty still pervade the daily
lives of millions of Filipinos, as shown by other government statistics.
Real
wages in the country (taking inflation into account with 2000
as the base year) have actually fallen from P340.80 in 2001 to
P141.97 in 2007.
Even
worse, the daily minimum wage in the NCR of P362 is just 40% of
the estimated family living wage of P806 (as of December 2007).
Further,
according to the 2006 Family Income and Expenditure Survey, the
country's poorest families (some 13.9 million) found themselves
with less income than in 2001. The situation is worse for the
poorest 5.2 million households who remain mired in debt, with
an average of P1,700 debt per household in 2006.
Inequality
also remained severe in 2006, as the richest 20% of Filipino families
(3.5 million) accounted for 52.8% of total family income, while
the poorest 80% (13.9 million) had to share the remaining 47.3
percent. The income of the richest 10% of Filipino households
was equivalent to 19 times that of the poorest 10 percent.
IBON
News / March 6, 2008
AS
OFFICIAL POVERTY DATA SHOWS :
'28 Quarters of Economic Growth Don't Benefit Filipino Majority
The
trend of worsening poverty in the country noted by the FIES confirms
how the majority of Filipinos in the country don't benefit from
economic growth. Independent think-tank IBON Foundation issued
this statement in response to the paid advertisement published
by Malacañang allies saying that the economy enjoyed 28
quarters of economic growth under the Arroyo administration.
According
to IBON research head Sonny Africa, growth in gross domestic product
(GDP) averaged 5.4% in the period 2003-2006, yet the number of
poor Filipinos even increased by 3.8 million.
"In
contrast to the government's underestimated poverty levels, IBON
notes that some 70%-80% of Filipinos try to live off around P100
or less every day," said Africa.
The
problem lies most of all in government neglect of the manufacturing
and agricultural sectors, which are at their smallest shares of
the economy since the 1950s, added Africa. This decline in the
country's economic foundations drove the unemployment rate to
an average of 11.4% in the 2003-2006, which is the worst four-year
period of unemployment in the country's history. There were 11.6
million Filipinos jobless or otherwise underemployed and looking
for additional income in 2006.
Backward
industry and agriculture cannot create jobs and the labor force
is being forced into low-paying, irregular and insecure jobs in
the service sector.
For
instance while the government hyped 2007 as seeing the fastest
economic growth in three decades, the most jobs created last year
were in the additional 142,000 working as domestic household help.
The
trend of worsening poverty also exposes the folly of relying on
overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) and remittances to support domestic
household incomes. Poverty has increased despite ever-increasing
number of OFWs going abroad and record remittances. By last year,
nearly 3,000 Filipinos were going abroad to find work every day
and the stock of some nine million overseas Filipinos remitted
a record US$14.5 billion. Yet the government is continuing with
this retrogressive cheap labor export policy.
The
government also continues to promote economic activities that
profit foreign corporations rather than benefit the domestic economy.
It is promoting foreign investment-intensive call centers and
business process outsourcing (BPO), mining, and manufacturing
in export enclaves. Unfortunately these are sectors of weak job
creation, little multiplier effect, no technological spillover,
and poor contributions to the domestic capital stock. It is also
pushing free trade policies such as the JPEPA and through ASEAN
even if such trade and investment liberalization has been among
the main factors that have undermined the domestic economy.
"Without
fundamental changes in economic policies, the country's joblessness
and poverty situation can only get worse, and the so-called sustained
growth will only benefit foreign and big local business,"
said Africa.
Not
again, Philippines on ‘deteriorating’ list
The
Philippines has once again been downgraded by the Brussels-based
International Crisis Group (ICG), an international think-tank
focused on crisis analysis worldwide.
ICG’s
February 2008 report included the Philippines on its list of countries
with “deteriorating situation” due to increased presence
of government troops in Metro Manila. The country is listed together
with Cameroon, Comoros Islands, Congo, Ethiopia, Israel, Somalia
and Serbia.
The
group noted that the number of military and police forces increased
in the county’s capital in the midst of anti-government
rallies and an alleged plot to assassinate President Gloria M.
Arroyo. ICG also noted that the massacre in Maimbung, Sulu last
Feb.4 where eight civilians including two children were killed,
contributed to the deteriorating situation of the country.
Another
China deal: Arroyo gave up sovereignty over Spratlys?
The
Arroyo administration is likely to hit another wrong turn as Senate
and the House of Representatives prepare to probe into the 2004
agreement between China and the Philippines for an alleged $8 billion
loan package in exchange for trading Philippine sovereignty claims
over Spratly, a group of islands in South China Sea.
The government signed the Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking (JSMU)
agreement in 2004, allowing China – as well as Vietnam - to
gather seismic data off Palawan in an area largely within the Philippines’
territorial waters. Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto Romulo quickly
defended the deal as “a plus, not a sell out”.
Lawmakers this week filed resolutions seeking an inquiry to determine
whether the agreement is tantamount to the “sellout”
of our sovereign rights in exchange for “overpriced loans”
to fund corruption-laden projects.